HRC 3 of 4 - Searchable.pdf

Text-only Preview

FBI IHFC.
CLAS SIFI ED BY NSICG C.2SV(34B64
REASON. 1 .4 vCJ
DECLASSIFY CN : 12- 31 -20 41
DATE. 09- 22 -20 15
-1-
h'RDERAL BURE AU OF INV ESTIGAT ION
<1 POCO» On Feh ruarv 2o. 201h . .o m
mlcm ow cil hv fede ral Bür ;;!« uiTnve stigu tion ij' Bi) Sp ecial -VuciHs
wasT
was
and!
as wel \ us anti
at I he FBI Washington Reid Office. 601 A'h Street NW. Wa&hiiyton DC. Present for the imervie u
leouns cu
_______
Attorn ey at Law. at
from the Denartffleit of Justice (DOJ)
agreed to siu n;! non-
iA>umennieliigence and Kxjx>rt Control Section. Prior to the interview!
____
disclosure u;ji cement in anticipation o f viewing classified documents during the inteiview. Alter [.wing
:xd\ >scd o f the identities of the inter viewing agents, and she purpose of the interview,
provided die following information:
ii i.-Vfr't)i ^ beca me th e U .S. De nartm en! o f S tate {Do S)
land er 1 f
cont inu ed to serve- as- she unde r -------------1
J
beca me ihe und er befo re beim : nam ed the
. As the offic e was lo cate d in W as hing ton D C but he trav ele d iVcquent iy a nd
took trips io Afghanistan and Pakistan every four to six weeks.
did not have frequent contact with the Secretary o f State when
did not nave trequ
This was because |_
communications with the Secretary and her team lumscll.
iiaudk'd alt of die direct
___
[described his role under
as be in« external facing. Me further explained that he was n^p.msihlt- for ^oordinaiiiv..
with Congress and laei! Hating other hyer:
focused on Afghanistan matters when,
focus ntainlv on Pakistan, in this; role.
econo mic enga gem ents.
becam e th e I l bccau sc
had m ore resa dar co ntact wit h the Sec retary and her
became more
wanted to
team, which included traveling to the rcyion with {hem.
iS' i'( M '()}
__________
provided that he primarily interacted with the following individuals on
the Secretary's team: CHERYf.. MILLS for USAID and communications mailers; JAK.E .SULLIVAN for
policy manor* and so raenare for Denn tv Committee or Principal Committee meetings; HUMA ABE DIN
iil£
;lv iiikHK ?:■> <itta
ba sh es : an dT idr communications matters. noted that he has
b6
b7C
b6
b7C
b6
b7C
b6
b7C
i«: ... JJl^V'20!.<>..
;>> sa
Jsti&lfO
.....
.-S.A..
SA
: ili ; '.h KM tn vi ii :!v-r ki^ io u s HU ti IS >l :c i - fo j i^ a y . 4 !;: s- M M .; :ui K; H
i »ItiviSIi- .i: , ;;‘>i U- IV sin Pod v.»;;- .itN’iU')
-w ^ s i X T r. ' *H-
b3
b7E
fH P S I '*&■
bl
b3
t’4>V!ii">HUt!>sF> ifi t' D - K C l!l ' . On
b6
b7C
a.w o i ; o ) comm unic ated dire ctly with SUL LIVA N and MILL S for an ythin g tha t
needed the Secre tary's atte ntion . E xamp les mclu dc to pics that invo lved inter natio nal matte rs. topics that
could pote ntially imp uci DoS e quiti es, and t opics inv olvin g pri vate secto r en gage ments . T hese excha nges
could he ei ther class ified or u ncla ssifie d de pendi ng o n th e .specific conte nt and w ere done via the
appro priate telep hone or email syst em.
<L.-/+*H-*») While at D oS,
;.i j WK'S acco unt. DoS also issu ed
email accou nt, a nd a STL for his h osm
overse as b ecause oth er c omm unica tion chan nels were oft en no t av ailable .
had ifcii Open.Net and Ciass Net acco unt but he did not have
a Bla ckber ry. which wa s lin ked !o his unc lassifi ed DoS
used his Black berry ema il ex tensiv ely whe n he was
f i ’-LOU O) could o nly recall one inst ance follo wing the birth of his .son w hen he
receive d an e/nail dire ctly from the Sec retary, Me r emem bere d that the ema il ca me from a no n-Do S em ail
was n<,n aware that the Secr etary was using
aware o fan v o ther DoS
accoun t but he didn't think m uch of it a? the tim e,
a priv ate em ail accou nt a nd s erver to c ondu ct D oS b usine ss, n or w as
emplo yees usin g per sona! ema il acc oun ts f or offi cial busin ess. provi ded thai lie had the
persona l ema il a ddres ses of bo th S ULLI VAN and M ILLS but he di d not recal l ev er ushm those acc ounts
ibi of ficial bus iness.
b6
b7C
b6
b7C
b6
b7C
confir med that he was read into a Spec ial
underst ood the
Access Pro gram,__________________________________________________________
sensit ivities surr ound ing the p rogra m a nd t he nee d to app ropria tely safe guar d re lated info rmatio n. As
such, the DoS s tance was not so publ icly c omm ent osi the progra m.
bl
b3
bl
b3
was s hown a co py o f an emai l cha in from
stated that lie did not
Decem ber o f 201 i wit h th e sub ject "( S H U ' A fter r eview ing the e mai
remem ber t he ci rcum stan ces in whi ch the em ail was o rigin ally sent. .Howeve r, b ased on th e ema il t ime
stamp b elieved he was in C alifor nia when he r eceiv ed t he c ma
had am oth er me ans o f fo rwar dhm the i nform atio n to thos e wh o ne eded it.
and t hat woul d not have
stated thai
bl
b3
T; bl
b3
H'- iiCasiicv
bl
b3
<. '■isiiiHijiiio;'! of
sendin g in formati on on M»c uncfcissifled svste ro w as no t id eal bus ihat he oi'lcit
.....On b6
b7C
did no: hav e a c hoice wh en it came in time sen sitive infor mation . did n ot re call receiv ing any
specific tra inmg or y uidaisee on how time sen sitive inf ormati on should be trsinsn iined.
------------
-----
1 was sh own a eop v o f an email chai n from
I'ebruar v o f 2012 with the sub jeet 'VUert.' did no! rem emb er t he em ail chain. Ho wever , afi er
i'eviewiu y the emai l he state d tha t
Nonethel ess, did not h ave c once rns s end ing this ty pe o f in forma tion on an
unclas sified syst em becaus e she story
(he inf ormat ion t o the Secr etary bef ore ihat o ccu rred .
was s hown a eo rw o f
with the s ubject
the rei erenc ed a rticle betni i rele ased in the p ress. could not recall at
sn email chain Irons
stated it was se nt p rior to
]v fur ther d etails abou t the
intbrm auo n p rov iik ilii uii iie nia il. He noted that a n umb er o f simi lar st ories were bi-ing relea sed by the
press ai that time.)___________| belie ved that the mfor mutio n in the em ail c ould be treate d as unc lassifie d
because the artic le wa s abo ut io he rele ased and it was criti cal that he no tify the appro priate pe ople within
LJoIS.
Wits show-!! .<! v it-ntnH :'ii;un tWnv-
with th e su bject
provide d th at the emai l w as ib rwar dmg a n ews articl e oi 'inte rest to indiv idual s wi thin DoS.
slated that die c omm ents he includ ed when he f orwar ded the e mail were not mean? io c onfirm the
; vera eftv
further expl ained that
oi she news articl e but rat her io exp ress his frustr ation with the art icle .________
2D! ; was a pa rticul arly diffi cult perio d f or bil ateral rel ation ships io t he re gion and that DoS effor ts w e r e
often c ompl icated hv such arti cles.
noted that it was unus ual for hi m io inte ract direct ly with
___________________________
[provi ded that he
forward ed t he em ail becaus e it was a m atter that requir ed the im med iate atten tion of DoS i o pre serve hs
v'Ouities.
bl
b3
bl
b3
bl
b3
bl
b3
was s hown a co py o f an email cha in from May bl
Ol' 201 with ihe su bject "U pda te.”! did n ot rec all the e sact circumsisWeC;? s.5 emai l but b3
((:/7H H Ai the co nclu sion of't he interv iew not ed th at n one of the ema ils ih at he
wtts show n we re or igina ted by him . T he em ails eith er in volve d i nform ation tha t wa s abo ut io be release d
pitbiielv or were author ed by an othe r in dividua l.
b6
b7C
s r *&- bl
b3